So the Red Cross tells us there’s a humanitarian crisis in our NHS hospitals and ambulance services. What reactions does that trigger in your mind?
This is the same Red Cross which is helping those left alive flee the ruins of Aleppo, and in context I don’t know about you but I have a problem with that language. I don’t mean to shrug “Crisis, what crisis?” but the point is that it is so easy to make headlines by building on public perceptions and so hard to challenge them.
Many players within the NHS ecosystem and media thrive on continual crisis but strangely it doesn’t help us to measure, analyse, reflect and redesign. We are addicted to firefighting.
Now I want to raise the subject of cognitive dissonance. If you haven’t yet read Matthew Syed’s “Black Box Thinking” then I urge you to do so: well written, engaging and with a powerful message. (the subtitle about marginal gains doesn’t do it justice. It’s much more about learning from failure).
I’ll declare an emotional “COI” here in that aviation comes out much more favourably than healthcare, and some decades ago I was a tiny cog in the industry at Rolls-Royce aero engines. The difference centres around attitudes to failure: forensic analysis, learning and rapid dissemination in aviation, versus cover up in health. Doctors have admitted to me that that’s a huge fear of failure in medicine, but the problem as Syed so eloquently puts it is that failure happens continually and repeatedly. Aviation by contrast is very open, and very safe.
I’ve talked for some time about the primal fears which keep GPs from change, impenetrable to evidence. But perhaps I’m wrong, it’s more the gap between beliefs about current practice and what we imagine we might have to do – cognitive dissonance.
Does reframing the problem make it any easier to solve? Your thoughts gratefully received.
PS Counter that crisis thinking with this US doctor’s experience of the NHS as a patient. We must count our blessings vs USA never mind Syria.
Yesterday in deep frost the view from Great Mell Fell in Cumbria was blissful. I hope your holiday had similar moments, and they will continue to inspire as we get to work in 2017.
I’m optimistic about the year ahead as more and more GPs and their patients are seeing the benefits of a demand led system, whether phone or online. But I’m concerned about polarising views and we saw this only last week when, perhaps to her own surprise, RCGP chair Helen Stokes-Lampard made the front page of the Sun with “A MONTH TO SEE GP” winter misery shocker.
The testimony of hundreds of GPs says there’s no need for a trade off between workload and waiting time, and no need to divide the infinitely variable needs of patients into “urgent, trivial” and “routine, life threatening.” They know they can deal with demand as it comes in, appropriately and compassionately. We shall keep on putting that message across because it happens to be based on evidence.
Already today this year a new practice has launched, in the west of Fermanagh about as rural as it’s possible to be in these islands. There isn’t even a house next to it, just fields.
And this morning these three patients left the latest feedback on askmyGP:
Better since streamlined process. Thanks! (f 41)
Feel I can explain my problem easier writing it than talking about it. Quick service is great (m 38)
I use this service as it saves me from making a phone call, it is easy to use and i have received a follow-up call from the GP quickly (f 17)
This is what should be on the front pages.
Chief Executive, GP Access Ltd
PS we’ve been very busy today with enquiries on askmyGP, as new year prompts new ideas and minds turn to making the most of the GPFV funding. Do get in touch.
3:30 on Tuesday a practice manager tells me, “I’ve got GPs wandering around, wondering what to do. We’ve run out of patients”. Me: “Get them cleaning windows.” It was day 2 of launch.
Last week a receptionist at a practice 3 months in told me “it’s really quiet today” – we often hear the same, and no surprise, as there are some busy days and some quiet days if you’re close to patient demand.
Yesterday a Liverpool GP explains to me how they’d saved £50k as a practice in GP costs, enabled by their demand led system now going 4 years.
So why aren’t you seeing this all over the industry press? You know it doesn’t fit the narrative, #GPinCrisis and the rest. It doesn’t suit the interests of RCGP, BMA, NHS England or even the secretary of state.
Money and power need continual crisis.
GPs and their patients need something rather different, a way of working which is compassionate, sustainable and professionally satisfying.
Hunting down good news has a long history. Sorry if your child got the short straw and had to play King Herod this year, but take heart, the Wise Men got the better of him.
Founder, Chief Executive, GP Access Ltd
PS You must read @jtweeterson’s NHS Networks, a record year for trends “BMA’s Clinical Time Lost to BMA Workload Surveys survey” is the mark of genius.
PPS Did you get one of the emails sent to top GPs yesterday? Businesswoman and GP Clare Gerada writes, “As a leading member of the GP community, I hope you don’t mind in me blatantly promoting Web-GP (now known as e-Consult) an on-line GP consultation platform that myself and my partners developed.”
Some partners too, with businessman and civil servant Dr Arvind Madan now directing NHS England’s primary care. She continues,
“As part of the GPFV, NHSE has announced funding to stimulate the uptake of online consultation services over the course of the next 3 years”. That’s the ring-fenced £45m.
I’m sure you’re aware of the debate over our askmyGP and their webGP/eConsult. Competition on quality, service and evidence is greatly to be encouraged. Taking on the medico-political establishment was not part of our product planning, but hey ho, if that’s what it takes we look forward to it.
Do write to me about your experiences if you’re one of the 300 practices they claim to use eConsult.
Well I was right about the bombardment of doom ceasing for just one day. They are at it again, and NHS England’s £2.4 bn GP Forward View is “not nearly enough, not the right stuff and not soon enough.” Never mind, it is what it is.
Though not one of the 1700 words Shakespeare coined, “e-consultation” is centre stage and the thing that is going to transform general practice for a mere £45m. However, with no definition of what it means, I’d like to propose one, starting from the basics.
In our context, a consultation is a personal interaction between patient and clinician in order to provide medical help.
Where traditionally they have all been face to face, remote consultations can take place by telephone, video or digitally. (Letter would also fit the definition but I’ll assume there is little call for this. Even faxes are being smashed in the new modernisated NHS).
E-consultations are therefore a subtype of remote, and to hone the idea let’s look at what falls outside:
- not simply booking an appointment online (no interaction)
- not NHS 111 (even if it is digitised, only an algorithm, not patient-clinician)
- not Skype or other video, as like telephone these are synchronous means, patient and clinician present at the same time.
- not symptom checkers (not personal)
Therefore I propose:
An e-consultation is a personal interaction between patient and clinician initiated by digital means.
All very dry, and I think Shakespeare would have put it in plainer English along the lines of:
The patient seeks help from their GP online.
It’s much more fun to have a go. To my knowledge there are two systems available to NHS GP patients, our own askmyGP and Arvind Madan’s with Hurley Innovations Ltd.
You can try both as a dummy patient:
Next week I’ll compare the two feature by feature from published evidence.
Meanwhile, I’m interested in your views on the definitions and demos – please comment below
PS: If you missed the webinar in our series on Demand Led GP, you can see the recording here of “Unblocking the appointment system” getting to grips with demand and capacity. I explain how you can do your own Loadmaster for £35, which is proving popular.