Quite a week but let’s put all that to one side and reflect on a fabulous article I came across, which put into perspective what we are trying to do.
Dr John Launer of HEE asks in BMJ Is there a crisis in clinical consultations? Although he sets the paper in a hospital context, most of his working life has been in primary care and the same principles and questions apply. It’s all about
“the idea that making it easier for clinicians simply to talk with patients may solve many problems that managers might assume need far more complex technological solutions”
Aha. Let’s add to that the assumptions of politicians, along with structural, financial and all kinds of other complicated solutions.
Launer quotes Dr Gordon Caldwell who has outlined ten fundamental conditions to optimise consultations, including:
- The patient should be as prepared as possible
- The clinician should be as prepared as possible
- Ready supply of information into the consultation
Telephone consulting pioneer Dr Steve Laitner contrasts traditional general practice in a tweet, “like having a day of back to back meetings every ten minutes with no idea who you’re meeting and no agendas”
Stressful and far less productive than it might be.
Yet patients are willing to spend their own time writing and preparing when they seek help – we need the system to make it available to GPs.
A recurring theme of patient feedback on askmyGP is “I was able to gather my thoughts before seeing the doctor. I so often forget things when I’m in there.”
Clinicians value enormously what patients write, whether preparing for a phone or face to face consultation. Our task is to develop the handful of questions which provide the most useful information, and I’m delighted to say that researchers are interested in this too.
Our other focus is to make online access so easy and attractive that it becomes the norm. We are over 30% in one practice and it will take a lot of experiment and refinement but I’m looking forward to reaching 50%, which I hope will make a big contribution to clinical quality.
I’ll leave you to look up all ten principles in Launer’s article, but here’s one you will like: “The clinician should be regularly refreshed”. He doesn’t say what with.
askmyGP & GP Access Ltd
On cloud 9, or, “In a state of blissful happiness” is perhaps a little overstating it, but we are delighted to be on the government’s G-Cloud 9 Procurement Framework from 22nd May.
Phrases like “procurement framework” tend to bring me back down to earth with a bump, but I think this one could mean something really good, and I quote from the gov.uk Digital Marketplace:
“Buying services through frameworks is faster and cheaper than entering into individual procurement contracts.”
Right, so there’s one agreement set up between the Crown Commercial Service and us, following all the OJEU rules and thoroughly tested for compliance with all the relevant standards: NHS IGToolkit, Clinical Safety standards for software SCCI 0129/0160, secure hosting and communication on N3, you name it, all the painful, boring but essential stuff.
Yes it has been painful and I pay tribute to all the GP Access team and our partners who have done such a grand job in getting us there. It is right and proper for the process to be thorough as patient safety and information security are paramount. We have seen too much lately of what can go wrong, yet we must not lose sight of the great benefits that technology can enable for our health service.
In the first couple of weeks we’ve seen over 700 patients use the new askmyGP to get help online. One emailed Concord practice at 9.14am last Monday, a time when patients in most practices would still be hanging on the phone, trying to get through. She already had her problem sorted by the GP and just wanted to say thank you for the outstanding service.
Now that’s what really gets me on cloud 9.
PS Do explore our new askmyGP website, where all the services under What We Do are on the framework. One of the requirements of G-Cloud is that you can’t raise your prices for two years, which we weren’t planning to do anyway, but it means we can guarantee that if all you want is the online consultations Start package, it’s 25p/patient/year plus vat, and that can be fully funded by the ring-fenced GP Forward View allocation to CCGs.
PPS The application process did have its lighter moments, my favourite being where you have to agree to the statement that “all the above statements are true”. Unbeatable logic.
What an exciting week in NHS IT! Sorry I’ve been hiding for a month but we have all been intently focussed on launching version 2 of askmyGP. It draws on our evidence from 46,000 patient episodes in version 1, but the software and delivery mechanism are all new.
So if I said the rollout of the new system went exactly to plan, all pigs were fed and ready to fly, you’d call me a liar and you’d be right.
We were ten days late going live and patients had to go back to the telephone. We had one of those unexpected problems that got through all the testing and didn’t appear until the real world stomped in. We had to spend the weekend fixing it.
Then it worked. Already we’ve had good feedback from the first 300 patient uses, and some great suggestions from the first 7 practices which we have already implemented.
So what’s new? I won’t do too much detail for now but the step in thinking is all about flow. We know about demand, we know it’s predictable and very nearly flat (BMA refers again to “soaring demand” in its manifesto. They haven’t bothered to measure) but we know there’s no simple way to cut demand (we’ve tried like everyone else, and it doesn’t work).
The demand is the demand. But we can do much better if we make it flow, from entry to completion. The new askmyGP is designed exactly to enable that frictionless flow.
Delivered not on NHSmail but over N3, the new system is designed for greater security and reliability…
And then of course Wannacry happened… we switched askmyGP off on Friday night as a precaution but found no evidence of any incursion, so came back on Saturday lunchtime. Already a couple of dozen patients have entered demands at the weekend. They know not to expect help until Monday, but that helps the practice smooth out the morning rush on the phones.
Aha, the beauty of being open all hours, but not there all hours.
Can’t wait to tell you more, it is so exciting, but it’s getting late.
PS Not one but two practices complained to me that demand has been very low the last couple of weeks. I put it down to three causes.
1. Weather. In a demand led system, you get the immediate benefit of the sunshine dividend. If you’re booked up three weeks in advance, you never notice.
2. Randomness. Knowing your average demand and planning capacity for a bit more means that most days are less busy than planned.
3. Anxiety demand has dropped – both practices launched six months ago and patients have got used to the idea that there’s no need to plan illness in advance – the GPs are there when you need them.
Happy days! Now try getting Pulse to publish that.
I wrote last week to Mr Hunt and sat by the phone all weekend, but it appears ministers are not offering a proper out of hours response so I have little choice but to go direct to Emergency PMQs.
Your headlines: “a large number of surgeries are not providing proper out of hours care – and patients are suffering as a result because they are then forced to go to A&E.”
GPs have a contract since 2004, mostly GMS or PMS, which defines their core hours. Simply saying you don’t like it really won’t do. The Telegraph has “Under Mrs May’s plans, GPs will have to be open from 8am to 8pm every day of the week unless they can prove there is not demand in their catchment area.”
We’ve been measuring demand for over five years and I can assure you there is always demand, but we do need a higher level of understanding from our PM, well intentioned and intelligent as you are. Demand out of hours is predictable and perhaps surprisingly low, but covered by out of hours services (as provided for in the 2004 contract).
But you are confusing demand with capacity. We know precisely the profile of demand, by day, by hour, even by minute, we know what is in and out of hours. We also know that spreading the same capacity over longer hours will cut that capacity and increase costs. When Sir Amyas Morse states “They are seeking to improve access despite not having evaluated the cost- effectiveness of their proposals and without having consistently provided value for money from the existing services.” it is well worth listening. His NAO report says extended hours GP costs are 50% higher than core hours. I’ve seen evidence that the true ratio is closer to three times.
Ignoring the evidence you have deeply upset GPs and confirmed the view of many that they are being bashed. I could call this counterproductive but the language you’ll hear over the next few days is going to put such bland terminology in the shade.
I do more data nerdy stuff than emotions, but I want to finish on a note of hope and if you’re prepared to listen, read one thing. Dr Philip Lusty was exhausted and beaten, along with all his colleagues and staff, as I personally witnessed. Now read what happened.
webGP eConsult GPFV page suggests a rush to sign up to a plan by 23 December.
Claiming 300 practices using the product, it is notable to see the extensive quotes from their 2013 pilot study of 20 practices, 14 of which are their own in Hurley Group. What about the other 286 are not Hurley Group and would provide recent independent testimony? Doesn’t the absence of any more recent case studies seem odd?
“Self-help and signposting options attempt to reduce demand on the practice” – this is a true statement. It is not a claim that it does reduce demand.
Productivity effects are discussed on page 9. The time to process is stated as 2.9 mins per e-consultation, but does that include a phone call to the patient? 60% solved remotely is plausible, but it’s not clear whether the 2.9 mins includes a phone call. The other 40% requires face to face, and if the average duration is 10 minutes, that’s 40% x 10 minutes, a further 4 minutes. The best possible assumption means an average of 6.9 minutes to complete a demand arriving as an e-consultation, 31% saving on 10 minutes. But how much demand has shifted channel?
Speaking at the EMIS NUG on 23/9/16, CEO Dr Murray Ellender showed this chart of demand shift reaching 7%. This is over 2 years, in a young adult metropolitan demographic. Whether this was 7% of demand we don’t know, because if supply is limited, it may be 7% of supply (easily done by restricting numbers of phone or face to face appointments).
The best case is to take it as read, such that 7% x 31% gives an overall saving of 2.17% of consulting time.
We wonder whether sufficiently sensitive measures are in place to detect such a change.
Several reasons lead us to doubt the quality of this evidence, and therefore whether a “best case” assumption is reasonable, beyond the fact that this is a tied practice. This is not a time series chart, although the x-axis may suggest this. It is three data points, with a straight line between them. It contains no actual numbers of episodes, only a % of channel shift, hiding the units. For a comparison of how real data appears, please see our Greenway Belfast case study, a practice which runs a demand led system meaning very rapid access equally from phone or online demand. This is significant as there is no need for patients to use online access to jump the queue, yet the data shows 20% channel shift within 2 weeks of launch.
The lack of independent practice case studies, and the 0.7% demand shift in the original Hurley study, tells us that in the vast majority of practices the channel shift is an order of magnitude lower.
Note: we have requested a fair copy of the original case study from Dr Ellender, but no response was given. The presentation in full is available here. In a November 2016 presentation in Sweden, Dr Omar Hashmi claimed many were at 7% and some up to 30% – I wonder where is the data?
I’ve had to re-write the whole thing because, deep joy, we’ve made it to the front page of the Daily Mail. And as everyone knows, the only good news in DM is royal babies so to be traduced in such huge type is truly living the dream.
You can read the fully made up Mail Online version here. We even made it to the leader page where they deliver the knock out punch, “This scheme’s advocates should think again.”
What’s funny about DM is the setting up of falsehoods so easily overturned. “3 minute phonecalls” – no, the average is 5, but they can vary quite a lot. But then we measure the duration rather than just inventing numbers. It’s so much harder work.
“Campaigners warn that some, particularly the elderly, might be fobbed off or end up going to casualty.” Yeah, but then I discovered the pioneers because they had lower A&E numbers. And we have 6,798 patient feedbacks which are overwhelmingly positive, with the elderly especially so.
Forgive me for quoting directly from the Mail’s online comments. There’s the predictable
“Bet the immigrants don’t have to be questioned on the phone.”
“My doc has an online questionnaire and generally a three week wait to see a doc.”
and the well informed
“I had this two weeks ago. GP rang me, quick discussion on my problem and she called me into her surgery the very same morning and saw me. Turns out is was fairly serious, so it worked well for me.”
The patients get it.
PS New evidence this week looking at the GP PES shows how good access is shining through. This is worth a click: Analysis of access in large GP groups.
It’s been a tumultuous week as big business interests threaten our way of life like never before. Thankfully the attempt by Toblerone to bury the bad news as they cut 10% off our chocolate has spectacularly backfired.
More important news struggling to get heard is the publication of the first of 44 STPs covering England. BMA complains “GPs shut out of STP talks”, so what do they mean for primary care? Well I’ve pored over them so you don’t have to (at least, the parts I want to, with my secret method, ctrl-f in the document and search for the words…).
So I started with “demand” and there are dozens of references. What’s funny is that about half of them bemoan the inexorably growing demand across all our services, usual stuff. And then without a trace of irony, the other half outline our plans to reduce demand. One quotes 30% of GP activity!
Compared with predicting election outcomes, forecasting healthcare demand is laughably easy. Add 1 – 2% to last year’s demand and you’ll be within a gnat’s.
Apart from a few niche areas, the reason that demand keeps going up is because no one has found a way to reduce it. Everyone including us has tried – are we the only ones to admit it isn’t working? So reducing “demand” in STPs is either wishful thinking or in reality reducing supply, more concisely called rationing. That word doesn’t occur even once as it very quickly gets you the sack.
Try another word, “digital”. Dozens and dozens of references, all positive, and generally linked with the word “enabler”. I like this way to describe digital, because it can be an enabler of change though I don’t see it working as a driver. We haven’t yet found a way to reduce demand but it certainly can enable us to deal with demand more efficiently.
There is no doubt that digital is going to be a major component of change in the NHS over the next few years. What is unknown is how, but I’m sure it will only make an impact if it works brilliantly both for patients and GPs.
STOP PRESS: this new Dutch study on the impact of their NHG health info website is seriously encouraging for demand reduction.
PS We put a lot of effort into measuring patient feedback, as unless it’s very positive patients won’t use digital channels. High usage is the only way to get a return on all that investment in technology. We’re putting these patient measures in the public domain and keeping them updated.
Last week I was at the RCGP annual conference in Harrogate and a jolly good time it was too, meeting friends old and new and having all the same conversations, with a new case study from Belfast. Even made it to a fine Yorkshire tea at Betty’s.
But the highlight by a mile was when I snuck in to one of the plenaries to hear Kate Allatt give her astonishing story. Surviving a rare brain stem stroke, she told how she worked her way out of locked in syndrome, from being left almost for dead on a hospital ward to taking her first running paces a year later.
We will never know all the ups and downs of that year but what hit home to me was when she was back home and struggling daily with 3 young children on top of everything. In desperate need of help she suffers the usual nightmare of trying to get an appointment with her GP.
“Why can’t I call my GP at any time of day?”
What an utterly reasonable request.
Huge applause for her talk, and I think we were all genuinely moved. We’ve talked since and the common bond is that what Kate sees as utterly reasonable, we know is completely possible (and actually less work). Watch this space!
PS I won’t bore you with the agonies of this job but we have survived five years, and just occasionally there’s a shaft of light. Millbrook Surgery in Somerset launched earlier this year and a patient put this story in the local paper.
For many years my wife and I have woken up to the soothing strains of Radio 3 (70 years old today) at precisely 7.04am, to ensure that we miss the news.
Our generation are the luckiest humans ever to have lived on earth, yet corruption, violence and calamity make up so much of what the media feeds us.
Good news doesn’t sell, they say, and pychologists think they understand. The only positive I can draw from the research on why all the news is bad is that we are more likely to share positive stories with friends.
Well, let me tell you about something momentous happening in Northern Ireland, consistently found to be the happiest place in the UK. We helped four practices there through our launch programme and we took the evidence to the chief executive of the health board.
It’s the same evidence that we have put to NHS England times, and to endless CCG board meetings, groups large and small over the last five years, all of whom smiled kindly and explained to us why it wouldn’t work.
But the chief executive of the NI Health Board said “I get this. How fast can you roll it out?”
Dr Tom Black is the chairman of NI’s GPC and is leading change from the front. He has written for the BMA and the RCGP. Hear him make the deeply unsettling and countercultural claim that “the GPs are more relaxed.”
At the invitation of the Health Board, a further 28 practices are planning to change before Christmas, and we may see the start of an unstoppable movement. How to spin this?
92% of NI GPs shun free help with workload
Patients rage: “It would be extremely hard to use this service if I worked full time”. “Older people would struggle”. “You’re not having to call the surgery 50 times.”
I’m rubbish at bad news. Will never get a media job.
Founder, Chief Executive, GP Access Ltd
PS. Meanwhile NHS England is throwing £6/pt/year at extended hours and weekend working. They totally miss the point about what matters to patients, undermining continuity of care at huge cost, simply ignoring the evidence. If over the next 18 months we see NI primary care moving clearly ahead of England in terms of patient satisfaction, cost effectiveness and GP morale, you read it here first.
PPS New resource, all patient feedback on askmyGP reviewed and complete unedited raw data available here.